Showing posts with label Video. Show all posts
Under Your Feet (2026)
7 months ago
If it's new to me, I'll tell you what I really think. Updates Wednesday nights.
Showing posts with label Video. Show all posts
Image via WikipediaIt looks like I forgot to do a 4-year index back in April, and these indices do make it easier to find things, so let's get back on track.
Posted in Attraction, Book, Fiction, Food, Graphic Novel, Housekeeping, Movie, Music, Nonfiction, Recipe, Restaurant, Television, Video by Laura | 0 comments
Email this postPosted in Attraction, Bar, Book, CD, DVD, Fiction, Food, Graphic Novel, Housekeeping, Movie, Museum, Music, Nonfiction, Recipe, Restaurant, Television, Theater, VHS, Video by Laura | 0 comments
Email this postPosted in Brian, Chris, DVD, Movie, other people's reviews, Paul, Video by Laura | 0 comments
Email this postYou can get reviews of the newest and hottest books, movies, and restaurants anywhere, but where do you go to hear about chain restaurants, library finds, several-year-old DVDs, or even tourist traps? Just because it's old or ever-present doesn't mean it's not new to you -- and you deserve to read the reviews in advance even then. So if it's new to me, I'll tell you what I think.
Who am I? I'm Laura, a married New Yorker and sometime cube monkey. Old posts follow me from being in a long term, often long-distance relationship, and through my engagement. They also follow me from when I lived in Philadelphia (where I grew up), and on several vacations, as my now-husband and I love travel and good food. As for occupation, you can go back to when I was in grad school, and watch me put up with periods of unemployment and cube-monkey-ism.
If you look over to your right, you'll see a Twitter feed. Feel free to follow me -- among other things, I post there when I post, and when I update old blog posts. And if you want to know a bit more about me, personally, check out my other blog at Life is (not) Boring -- or, if you're really patient with sporadic updates, check out my thoughts on writing at Writers Write.
And enjoy browsing! I'd love to know your thoughts on some of the things I've tried and shared -- especially if they've changed since I've been there. Thanks!
Posted in Attraction, Book, CD, DVD, Food, Housekeeping, Movie, Museum, Restaurant, Television, Theater, tour, Video by Laura | 0 comments
Email this postPosted in Chris, DVD, Nonfiction, Television, Video by Laura | 0 comments
Email this postPosted in 2008, Brian, Chris, Dad, Dan, Mom, Music, Video by Laura | 1 comments
Email this postTo Kill a Mockingbird
1962, on DVD, from the library
You should know
I’m working my way through AFI’s Top 100 movies. This one currently ranks 25 (up from #34 in 1997) – not to mention #2 most inspiring, #17 best score, and #1 hero for Atticus Finch.
Also, this is my 100th post. Whoo-hoo!
So?
Even now, Atticus Finch comes across as a fairly nontraditional parent; I can only imagine how he would have seemed when the move first came out – or, for that matter, when the book was first published. On that note, I really need to read the book, don’t I?
If you’re not familiar with it, the story is about a single father and his family. The kids are intrigued by their secretive neighbor; the father is a lawyer defending an African-American man in rather racist criminal trial. The movie follows the summer and autumn during which these events occur.
I do have a question: Scout is telling the story, right? So when she says that her brother Jem never told anyone about something that happened to him, that she did not witness, how does she know it to tell it in this story?
Other than that nagging issue, the movie was quite enjoyable. Was it deserving of so many accolades? Possibly; it’s hard to tell the impact of a film so many decades later (viewers who see The Matrix for the first time are already growing unimpressed with the special effects, for instance, and it’s only eight years later).
Rating
See it…
…if only so that you can say you did. Personally, I enjoyed the film, but even if it doesn’t sound like your thing, there’s a lot to be said for having a working familiarity with the canon of your culture.
The rest of the Internet
The Wikipedia pages for the novel and film.
Lots of study guides for To Kill a Mockingbird (warning: some of these have pop-up ads).
And those were just for the book. This is for the film.
Flash movie: How to Kill a Mockingbird.
Excellent reviews at Rotten Tomatoes.
Paco Malo at Gold Coast Blue Note was inspired by the movie.
ACR at My Take reflects on the camerawork.
MusicAndShowGirl at Blogs and Such compares the film to the book.
Awesome link of the week
Dumb Little Man has a list of ways we can keep the best parts of the holiday season alive all year. More plants? More letters? I'm in! I hope everyone's holidays have been great, and don't forget: technically, Christmas isn't over 'til Epiphany!
Posted in 1960s, DVD, Library, Movie, Video by Laura | 2 comments
Email this postDriving Miss Daisy
1989, on VHS, from the library
You should know
Yeah, that’s right. There’s a whole slew of classic movies – a canon, really – that I have not seen, or had not until recently. I’m trying to correct that.
So?
Some people have problems with this film. Yes, Hoke has an air of “Magical Black Man” about him that can make the viewer a bit uncomfortable if s/he is looking for it. But since the plot of the movie is about race relations and employee-employer friendships, all tied up with an idealistic bow, that really comes as no surprise.
Daisy Werthan is a wealthy Southern Jewish woman with what’s made clear early on is far too much pride for her own good. No longer able to drive, she has no choice but to accept the services of the driver her son, Boolie, hired for her.
Hoke, the driver, is as meek and polite as he’s expected to be given the place and time, but as he gets to know the Werthans better, he rapidly picks up on exactly how much BS he can – and should – put up with. This being the movies, Daisy finds herself respecting and even liking him, in spite of herself.
Their partnership evolves as they age and the times change, and in the end, there is a tenderness between them in their advanced old age. It’s a sweet, if slightly cheesy, film.
Question to those who’ve seen it: do you think, in retrospect, it deserved to beat Born on the Fourth of July, Dead Poets Society, Field of Dreams, or My Left Foot?
Rating
See it if...
You're like me and are trying to catch up on pop-culture canon... or if you just like a nice, simple story. But avoid it if you have a tendency toward finding things offensive when no offense was meant -- again, the movie is about race relations, so if you're looking to be offended, you will definitely be able to find something offensive here.
The rest of the Internet
The original play.
The IMDb page and wikipedia article.
Decent reviews at Rotten Tomatoes.
Roger Ebert weighs in.
Awesome link of the week
The Simple Dollar is a personal finance blog I've come to particularly like. The author, Trent, pulled himself out of financial ruin and takes the time each day to share his experiences, from how to have fun while pinching pennies to what personal finance books he finds most useful. He's an entertaining writer, and is always willing to reference fellow bloggers and take on challengers. I personally have bookmarked posts on Maximizing EBay sales, building a net worth spreadsheet, making homemade laundry detergent, free, fun weekend activities and other frugal weekend projects, ways to make leftovers better, indoor gardening, and writing thank-you notes.
Completely unrelated note
I'm considering changing the template of this blog, but I've been having some trouble uploading any of the ones I've picked out. I'm open to help or suggestions (and I wouldn't turn down a template, either, but don't go to any trouble).
Posted in 1980s, Housekeeping, Library, Movie, VHS, Video by Laura | 1 comments
Email this postMarch of the Penguins
2005, on DVD, from the library.
You should know
There are few things on earth, if any, that are cuter than baby penguins. But you already knew that.
So?
Sadly, the baby penguins, while appropriately adorable, were the most memorable part of the film. The story is that of penguin migration, the march of young adults from the feeding waters to the thickest, most solid part of the ice where they live. Here, there is something of a convention of penguins, who meet to mate and raise their young.
And there’s danger from starvation and predators, and eggs fail to hatch and chicks freeze to death. Parents who lose their young mourn, and then leave the breeding ground to return to their childfree lives. The babies that make it through their infancy are then left to make it on their own. They won’t breed for a few more years, and it’s likely their parents won’t survive long enough to see them at the breeding ground. Add in the fact that penguins are monogamous, but only for one season at a time, and that means that each family, as close and caring as it is, only exists for a few months.
Morgan Freeman’s narration – at least in the American version, I can’t comment on the original French – brings the perfect amount of authority to the narrative. Unfortunately, that authority comes with a sense of calm that does not underscore the drama; instead it almost downplays it. As interesting as the visuals and narrative were, the film still failed to hold my attention the way I had expected. If you’re having game night and want a film on for entertaining background noise, this is the way to go. If you want something that will captivate your attention and really engage you for two hours, though, you might want to pass.
Rating
Worth a view
Though it’s not the most engrossing film I’ve ever seen, it entertained and informed. And there’s nothing cuter than a baby penguin.
The rest of the Internet
The IMDb page.
The Wikipedia page.
Great reviews at Rotten Tomatoes.
Roger Ebert reflects on penguins.
An interview with the director at National Geographic News.
The Onion has an editorial.
Penguins and Intelligent Design.
An enthusiastic review at Instacritic.
SenseList offers 9 Films Featuring Penguins.
Posted in DVD, Library, Movie, Video by Laura | 1 comments
Email this postSideways
2004, on DVD, from the library
You should know
I enjoy wine, Paul Giamatti, and Sandra Oh.
So?
I’m glad there’s at least a slight ray of hope in this film. While it was entertaining, it seemed to have the message that life sucks, and we are incapable of doing anything about that. Not the stuff of escapism, certainly.
Jack is getting married, and to celebrate, his college roommate, Miles, is taking him on a weeklong tour of California wine country. Miles is still recovering from a painful divorce and awaiting word on the publication of his novel, so Jack has resolved to get Miles some action on their trip. They meet up with Maya, a graduate student Miles knows from previous wine-and-writing trips, and her friend, Stephanie, who hits it off with Jack. Of course, Jack is getting married. Hijinks ensue, as hijinks tend to do, but with a ton of angst and depression mixed in.
It was an interesting movie. I actually learned a bit about the proper way to taste wine (if it’s actually not the proper way, don’t tell me!), and I laughed out loud at certain points.
Rating
Check it out
It wasn’t the most fun movie I’ve ever seen, and it’s really not one for the kids, but overall there really wasn’t anything wrong with it. It told a story, used characters that you can care about even as you realize you’d never be able to stand them in real life, and it entertains. That’s the most important thing.
The rest of the Internet
Beware of spoilers...
The IMDbpage.
The Wikipedia page.
Great reviews at Rotten Tomatoes.
Slate's wine columnist weighs in on the movie and its wines.
The Sideways Wine Club.
A reviewer at Salon disliked the movie, and comes very close to insulting those who like it.
An article on Santa Barbara, where the film is set.
Maurice at Antihelden reflects on Sideways and road trips.
Posted in 2004, DVD, Library, Movie, Video by Laura | 0 comments
Email this postMuch Ado About Nothing, 1993
VHS, from the Library
You should know
I was an English major as an undergrad, and Much Ado About Nothing was one of my favorite of Shakespeare’s plays. I read it in class and saw it on stage. I even get the Elizabethan-era dirty joke in the title. So when my mother got the movie out of the library, I was curious to see how this interpretation would work.
So?
Well, first of all, I was very much amused at the concept of Denzel Washington and Keanu Reaves as brothers, though I suppose it’s feasible when you consider that Don Pedro and Don John are half-brothers. That’s not made clear until nearly halfway through, though; my mother didn’t pick it up until I pointed it out about a half hour in.
There was entirely too much time and camerawork spent on completely gratuitous nudity. There’s no bathing scene in the play, so several minutes of bare behinds was not really called for. At the same time, the best way to stay true to the Bard’s vision is to make a lot of money, so no doubt these scenes would have suited him just fine.
Both couples were well matched, so that both Beatrice and Benedick and Hero and Claudio looked like sets of siblings. Also, in this show, as in most of Shakespeare’s plays, the good girl (in this case, Hero) is supposed to be fair (blonde), while the bad girl (Beatrice) is supposed to be dark (brunette). It’s the other way around in the movie, which distracted me more than it probably should have. In a similar vein, Beatrice makes a speech about how only little boys do not have beards, while a beardless Claudio lurks nearby. These aren’t crucial plot points, and most people probably wouldn’t notice them, but the English major in me protested.
Rating
Check it out
Sure, it dragged at moments, but overall it was pretty good. I’m never one to recommend watching a movie instead of reading the book, but plays always make more sense if you see them. If you can’t see it performed live, this movie certainly makes for an acceptable substitution. Just be wary – I didn’t compare line-by-line, so I can’t vouch for any kind of precise fidelity to the original. It’s close enough for entertainment purposes, though.
The rest of the internet
The Wikipedia entry.
A flash cartoon of the play.
Posted in 1990s, Library, Movie, VHS, Video by Laura | 0 comments
Email this postPosted in 1990s, 2006, Dad, Mom, Movie, Theater, VHS, Video by Laura | 0 comments
Email this postPosted in 2006, Library, Movie, VHS, Video by Laura | 3 comments
Email this post